Sharon Sitz and William Sitz were married for 16 years until Sharon sued William for divorce. The court awarded her a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct and adopted her proposed parenting plan. This made her the primary residential parent of their minor child and divided the marital property. Furthermore, the court determined that the husband was voluntarily underemployed and imputed additional income him in order to calculate his child support obligation.
To read the case in detail, click here.
Monday, October 28, 2013
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
Conflict from States Apart
Below is a recent case from the Tennessee Court of Appeals that deals
with several issues. First, the case deals with the Uniform Child
Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) where two states, in this
case California and Tennessee, both have a potential claim for
jurisdiction of the case. Second, it deals with the death of a parent
and the rights of the grandparents, who actually had custody of the
child at the time of the mother’s death.
To read the full details of the case, click here.
To read the full details of the case, click here.
Labels:
2013,
california,
child custody,
courtroom,
custody,
death,
division,
divorce,
dusty king,
father,
issues,
jennifer king,
jurisdiction,
king and king,
king plc,
lawyer,
mother,
parents,
rights,
tennessee
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)